XPost: az.general, az.politics   
   From: michelle@michelle.org   
      
   In article ,   
    brooks stockberger  wrote:   
      
   > > In other words, you reject whatever disagrees with your prejudices.   
   >   
   > No, I reject wildly non-correlated conclusions like his.   
      
   You reject what you disagree with, pretending that it's non correlated.   
      
   > >>>>> Interesting that you focus on one Harvard sociologist who attempts to   
   > >>>>> explain the cause, rather than focusing on the data themselves.   
   > >>>> Precisely, he has miscast the data, egregiously.   
   > >>> How so?   
   > >> Read the article and see.   
   > >   
   > > In other words, you're posturing.   
   >   
   > I posted the entire text, what kind of "posture" is that?   
      
   Yet you're unable and/or unwilling to say how he miscast the data.   
      
   > >> And we were supposed to believe your left wing elitist authored and   
   > >> blatantly false socio-economic correlations?   
   > >   
   > > I believe what makes sense.   
   >   
   > Not if you accept Sampson's silly thesis.   
      
   that's the reason I accept it, because it makes sense, unlike the claptrap   
   from your wingnut guru.   
      
   --   
   Check out the Hot Cocoa Party   
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)