XPost: az.general, az.politics, az.internet
From: lesliesethhammond@yahoo.com
"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
news:6m4d16dcg62eh63h73lu4ojo6hbpo9cnbm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:07:08 -0700, "Phxbrd"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
>>news:g01d16lsjupjob8fktm3bgfit18koecibe@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:55:42 -0700, "Phxbrd"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
>>>>news:c4tc16ttjq0p28g4lvq05cbbjgoavsdllj@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:01:13 -0700, "Phxbrd"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Floyd" <""Ralph\"@ ralphs.com"> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:0HkRn.21190$Xp4.16313@newsfe23.iad...
>>>>>>> Phxbrd wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:9j6b16hbu3jf5vndcgevb6q80lskkj7lmk@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:36:37 -0700, "Phxbrd"
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have three in-laws in the home construction bidness. Two are
>>>>>>>>>> general
>>>>>>>>>> contractors and the third manages a large painting crew. All
>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>> tell me
>>>>>>>>>> that it's been YEARS since they've had a gringo apply for work.
>>>>>>>>>> As
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>> earlier, employers hire applicants.
>>>>>>>>> As long as they're here legally, no problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And if they're not, should the jobs be shut down? I really don't
>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> they're legal or not. Why should you - aside from your ugly
>>>>>>>> racism,
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> is..
>>>>>>> Anytime a Mexican is arrested for a crime, you scream "racism."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dead wrong. I just don't call border crossing a crime.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither does anyone else.
>>>>
>>>>Oh really?
>>>>
>>>>> The difference between reasonable people
>>>>> and you Leslie is we want to make sure those who come here do it
>>>>> legally.
>>>>
>>>>Tell that to hungry children who can't wait the current 12-15 years for
>>>>legal immigration. You couldn't care less, could you?
>>>
>>> Why doesn't the Mexican government doesn't give a shit about them?
>>
>>I rest my case. You DON'T give a fuck about hungry children.
>
> Where does it end Lez-lie? I have to give a fuck about the millions
> of hungry children in Mexico?
No, not if you're a nasty scumsucking racist which everyone can see you are.
.
>
> Are you out there feeding them?
No, but I support their parent's efforts to do so. You, being a scumsucking
racist, clearly do not. That'll be due to the fact that you're poor white
trash.
>
>>>>Um, that'll be due to your rotten ugly racism innit.
>>>
>>> And you deny having an anchor baby.....Lez-lie....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'll bet you even call yourself a Christian, don't you? Would your
>>>>Jesus
>>>>share your ugly racism?
>>>
>>> Is this the same Jesus you called an "Ugly Jew" ?
>>
>>No, of course not,
>
> Oh yes you did. You said the Jews in Israel are the UGLY Jews.
No, I did not. You're lying again. You have no principles, have you?
> Jesus was born in Bethlehem and grew up in Jerusalem.
Having what to do with your filthy racist lies?
>
>>but why not answer the question instead of trying to
>>sidestep it? Are you ashamed way down deep inside?
>
> I don't answer false premises.
I rest my case.
>
> I can ask false premise questions too: How long have you been beating
> your Mexican wife who does donkey acts?
How low will you sink to avoid answering a simple question?
>
>>>> You want no restrictions placed on illegal border crossings
>>>>> and the criminals who are pouring over the border daily.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But you just said you nor anyone else(!) considers border crossing a
>>>>crime.
>>>
>>> Versus your support of illegal border crossings by criminals, correct.
>>
>>Can you read for comprehension? You're arguing with yourself.
>
> You're senile if you can't see the difference between your " considers
> border crossings a crime. " and my "considers illegal border crossings
> a crime. "
>
>>>>Your ugly racism will forever prevent it.
>>>
>>>>Make up your ugly racist mind, will you?
>>>
>>> I'm not the one with the conflict, Lez-lie. You seem to think you
>>> can pick and choose which laws you obey. Of course having common
>>> criminals in your family doesn't surprise me.
>>>
>>
>>Let's cut to the bottom line, shall we? Which do you think is more
>>important; adherence to a long-ignored law or meeting human needs?
>>Nevermind the evasions, m'kay, just answer the question as honestly as you
>>can. Otherwise you make yourself look foolish.
>>
>>Law or human needs?
>
> Law.
>
There, that wasn't so hard, was it? You've put human needs behind law,
right? You support our laws whether you happen to believe in them or not,
right? People's needs and supply and demand mean little compared to your
belief that the law is more important than anything else, right? I'm glad
to hear that, because if total amnesty is declared all persons here now
considered illegal will become lawful in one swell foop.
I know they can count on your support as soon as they all become legal and
uder full protection of US law. Right? You're not racist, right? You
believe 100% in all current laws, right? You'll never call US citizens ugly
racist names, right?
With that, I wash my hands of you.
Next!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
