XPost: az.general   
   From: lesliesethhammond@yahoo.com   
      
   "Michelle Steiner"  wrote in message   
   news:michelle-230678.12122426012011@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > In article <8qb42vFnfvU1@mid.individual.net>,   
   > "Phxbrd"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Mikey, why are you insulted when I refer to browndickers as   
   >> browndickers?   
   >   
   > No, I'm not insulted at all, Leslie.  A gay man might be insulted, but I'm   
   > not a gay man; for that matter, I'm not a man at all.  But you already   
   > knew   
   > that.  If you choose to use language that you believe to be offensive   
   > and/or insulting, that's your prerogative and your problem, but the   
   > feelings of the people you are attempting to insult are their own, and you   
   > do not own them.   
      
   You're being evasive.  Why?  If a brown dick is a natural result of   
   browndicking, how can be insulting to face that simple reality?   
      
      
      
   >   
   >> Also, why do you insist upon calling browndickers and/or cocksuckers the   
   >> obviously innocuous and misused word "gay"?  Isn't that more than a bit   
   >> misleading?   
   >   
   > Not at all; it is a common term for homosexuals, and part of the   
   > vernacular.   
      
   Vernacular of what group?  Gay is gay, and homosexuals are homosexuals.  A   
   rose by any other name is still but a rose.  Is the word homosexual too   
   honest for you?   
      
      
      
   >   
   > But as I said, it's OK to be gay.  So come out of your closet, Leslie, and   
   > acknowledge your homosexuality.  There's no reason to repress it; there   
   > never has been.   
   >   
      
   Does that childish device ever work for you?  Are you trying to insult me me   
   by implying that I'm a homosexual?  Do you see the irony?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)