Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    phx.general    |    Pheonix general chat    |    3,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,097 of 3,579    |
|    G. Reed to All    |
|    Socialist liberal open plan offices suck    |
|    01 Jul 14 05:42:47    |
      XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals       XPost: alt.burningman       From: greed@barackobama.com              Open plan offices may look cool, but in reality workers report       suffering from a lack of privacy, too much noise and, a new       study finds, are more prone to catch the flu. Josephine Fairley       reports on the downfall of the open plan office              I’ve always rather liked that vintage wartime poster ‘Coughs &       sneezes spread diseases’ – but now it seems as if there probably       ought to be one pinned up on the wall of every office. Um, if       you can find a wall to pin it to, that is. According to a new       study, it’s not being rammed up against fellow commuters on the       journey to work that spreads contagious everyday diseases: the       real culprit is the fashionably airy design of many offices,       which helps viruses to travel swiftly through a workforce –       therefore impacting on productivity and well-being.              I’ve never been a massive fan of the open plan office myself       (only ever worked in a couple, and found it scarily easy to be       distracted by the open tin of Cadbury’s Celebrations on a       colleague’s desk, or the conversation that I could semi-hear my       boss having. And then there was the colleague who liked to       return from a languid – and often liquid – lunch and play       plaintive Scottish tunes on her recorder while sitting under her       desk. But that’s another story …) As a result, and perhaps       unsurprisingly in the circumstances, most of my best work was       done in the hours before my colleagues arrived and the time       after they left, which made for an unhealthily long day.              Well, the study in Ergonomics – from four Stockholm scientists       with straight-out-of-Wallender names – looked at the ways in       which the different layouts of offices is related to sick leave       days taken. They researched many different configurations. The       single-room office (always my preference, for sheer, blinkered       productivity). A shared-room office (two or three workers). And       the various types of open plan offices: from small (four to nine       workers) through to large (more than 24), the ‘combi-office’       (with less than 20 per cent of the workforce not at individual       workstations, but working in teams) – and the ‘flexi-office’ (no       individual workspaces at all). Funnily enough, I was in one of       the latter just yesterday, belonging to a household name brand;       even the CEO is just hot-desking it, now.              And what were Stockholm survey’s findings? For female workers,       the worst offenders – in terms of sick days – were the three       sizes of open plan offices. If you’ve ever seen one of those       films of a ‘sneeze’ in which germs are seen to travel       extraordinarily long distances, it’s entirely obvious why that       would be the case.              For men, flexi-offices – with no individual workstations, though       some shared meeting rooms – were most likely to result in days       taken off, presumably for ‘flu, colds and the dreaded Norovirus       which is the viral equivalent of an Australian bushfire, felling       workers as it beats a path through an office or retail       environment and leaving devastation in its wake.              According to the Scandinavian researchers, however, it isn’t       only the ability of germs to travel through open-plan air which       impacts on health. It’s the other factors, which I certainly       always found difficult to deal with.              – Background noise (‘irrelevant sound’, as the researchers call       it): it can be stressfully hard to string a sentence together or       review a column of figures in monastic silence, let alone amid a       cacophony of conversations.              – Lack of visual privacy is another; it is a biological fact       that whenever you’re in a ‘crowd’ or public setting, the body’s       fight-or-flight mechanism is on permanent standby, even if       you’re completely unaware of it impacting on your adrenal glands       (and the knock-on effect on the immune system).              – Reduced ability to control personal space is another issue;       I’m all for making an office home-from-home as a way to enhance       its comfort factor, with aphorisms, flowers, family photos,       personal stationery items – working on the basis that I spend       way more waking hours at the office than I do in my own home, so       why not make it nice? But in a flexi office, you’re always a       nomad – so those reassuring items must necessarily go, depriving       you of that sense of feeling ‘at home’.              The findings, then, seem entirely logical to me. So with       absenteeism such a challenge for employers (do you just employ       an extra person in a role at all times, to cover for sickness?),       perhaps it’s time to return to the old-fashioned model, put back       some of those dividing walls, allowing workers peace and quiet,       a door to guard against ‘flu epidemics – and somewhere to Blu-       Tack that photo of the cat.              Architects, office designers and CEOs of multinationals affected       by thousands of sniffling workers, over to you.              http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-business/10665747/Open-       plan-offices-suck.-Why-people-are-finally-waking-up-to-it.html                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca