Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    phx.general    |    Pheonix general chat    |    3,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,187 of 3,579    |
|    Jonah The Whale to All    |
|    Obama the idjit doesn't understand acrim    |
|    14 Jul 14 03:50:01    |
      XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals       XPost: alt.burningman       From: jtw@msnbc.com              WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For President Barack Obama, it seemed       like the right thing to do, according to officials in his       administration: Release five Taliban detainees at Guantanamo Bay       prison in return for Bowe Bergdahl, the only known American       prisoner of war in Afghanistan.              As a political firestorm engulfs the White House over that deal,       Reuters interviews with current and former Obama administration       officials involved in the negotiations, along with U.S.       lawmakers, reveal how a close-knit circle in the Obama       administration pursued the plan despite intense discord in the       past over similar proposals.              The White House was ultimately persuaded to go ahead, in part,       after Qatar agreed to take the Taliban detainees and said it       would allow the United States to track the five men in the Gulf       emirate. Under that arrangement, the United States installed       extensive surveillance equipment to monitor their movements and       communications, the officials said.              The deal, however, has caused an uproar among Republicans in       Congress, who have questioned both the secrecy of the prisoner       swap and the wisdom of freeing five Taliban prisoners. Some of       Bergdahl's former comrades have also accused him of deserting       his post before his capture by the Taliban in June 2009. The       Pentagon has declined to comment on those allegations.              While they were prepared for some political blowback, Obama       administration officials said they felt the outcry would have       been fiercer if in six months' time, as the United States wraps       up its mission in Afghanistan, it emerged that Obama had missed       an opportunity to secure Bergdahl's freedom.              The officials said Obama himself decided to make the swap and       chose to broadcast the news on national television with       Bergdahl's parents at the White House. He wanted to send a clear       signal to Americans that this was his decision and that he would       uphold the maxim that the United States will always bring home       all its troops from the battlefield, the officials said.              "The United States has always had a pretty sacred rule, and that       is we don’t leave our men or women in uniform behind," Obama       told reporters in Warsaw on Tuesday.              Obama was aware that Bergdahl had been accused of desertion in       Afghanistan. But the vitriolic nature of the criticism has       surprised some in the Obama administration, the officials said.              The idea of swapping Bergdahl for Taliban detainees wasn't new.       It was first raised nearly four years ago and quickly ran into       opposition in the administration and Congress.              "There were real big, serious issues here about whether we       should exchange people, whether it would do any good” in terms       of the broader Afghan peace effort, said David Sedney, a deputy       assistant secretary of defence responsible for Afghanistan, who       left government in May 2013.              Sedney said he was sceptical of the deal while in government.              Officials involved in the diplomacy told Reuters that then-       Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and his predecessor, Robert       Gates, along with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,       initially raised strong objections to exchanging Bergdahl for       the five Taliban detainees.              At first, Clinton was deeply sceptical of talks with the       Taliban, but then supported a prisoner swap as a "confidence-       building measure" that would help start peace talks between the       Afghan government and the Taliban, the officials said. Those       broader talks never fully got under way, and Saturday’s prisoner       exchange was all that survived of that effort.              In public remarks this week, Clinton did not criticise Obama's       decision.              http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFKBN0EG05920140605                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca