Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    phx.general    |    Pheonix general chat    |    3,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,236 of 3,579    |
|    E.V. to All    |
|    Shocking reality show debated: Women giv    |
|    14 Jul 14 22:03:46    |
      XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals       XPost: alt.burningman       From: ev@aol.com              Lifetime’s new reality show is delivering some controversy       before it’s even been born. The network announced Wednesday a       new series titled Born in the Wild that chronicles pregnant       women giving birth outdoors, unassisted by doctors.              “What happens when the craziest experience of a woman’s life       becomes truly wild, and soon-to-be parents decide to take on an       unassisted birth in the outdoors?” asks the press release. “Born       in the Wild will document the journeys of young, expectant       parents who have chosen to give birth ‘in the wild.’”              It’s certainly a head-turning TV hook. But one obstetrician says       we already know what happens when women give birth in the wild,       and it isn’t good. “I understand everybody wants to believe we       overmedicalize pregnancy and that it’s a natural process.              But it’s a natural process that historically has caused an       extraordinary loss of life,” says Ron Jaekle, MD, a maternal-       fetal medicine specialist at the University of Cincinnati       Medical Center and the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Fetal       Center.              “There is not a single piece of literature that we had to read       growing up that didn’t talk about somebody’s mother or wife       dying in childbirth, it was part of the national vocabulary. In       the 1900s, a women died for every 1,000 babies born in the       United States. Today it’s .1 for every 1,000.”              The Lifetime series is taking precautions to help ensure the       safety of the mother and child. No first-time mothers will be       allowed to participate on the show and all participants will       have a clean bill of health. A trained emergency professional       will be on site. And while the couple will choose the birthing       location, the production will remain within a certain radius of       a hospital should complications arise.              “I’m not surprised an OB-GYN would say that [but] we’re taking       extreme precautions to make sure the mothers and the babies are       safe,” says Eli Lehrer, Lifetime’s senior VP and head of       nonfiction programming. “Our presence at these births is going       to make them far safer than if they were doing it on their own.”              The series itself was inspired by a viral video showing a birth       in a forest that racked up 20 million views (photo above).              Lehrer says he has a personal connection to the show’s concept       himself as his second child was born at home via midwife.              “This isn’t [Discovery Channel's] Naked and Afraid and we’re       dropping people in the woods and saying ‘go have the baby,’” he       says. “These are all people who have already had babies in       hospitals who had unsatisfying experiences and who are choosing       to have different experiences. This is something people are       doing and we set out to document it.”              Even with the safety measures in place, however, Jaekle insists       Born in the Wild “doesn’t make any sense.” He contends that even       with modern medical care, just giving birth at home — let alone       in a forest — is demonstrably more risky. “[The number of       children impacted] is a small number — until it’s your kid,”       Jaekle says of home birth complications.              “They can’t possibly make it safe enough to not [eventually]       have a problem that will need a medical intervention to save the       day. And then [the producers] won’t interview the docs in the       ICU who will say, ‘This would never have happened if she had       been in a hospital.’”              Another possible concern is the show inspiring couples not       protected by the production’s safety net to try this more       extreme “natural” route, something that’s particularly unsafe       for first-time mothers (which the show will not allow to       participate).              “I’m not worried this is going to spark a trend,” Lehrer says.       “I truly don’t think this is something people would enter into       lightly. This is a very specific subset of people doing this.”              The series was one of four new unscripted shows the network       announced Wednesday. The network also ordered Girlfriend       Intervention, a racial twist on Bravo’s classic Queer Eye for       the Straight Guy, about “four wise, poised and stylish African       American women, who, in each episode, help a white sister       seeking a complete makeover to restore her confidence and inner       glow.”              There’s also Threads, a “competition series showcasing America’s       most talented young fashion designers,” and Kosher Soul,       following a stylist and comedian who converts to Judaism to       please his wife.              http://insidetv.ew.com/2014/06/04/birth-in-the-wild-reality-       debate/                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca