Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2150  |
|  Martin Foster to August Abolins  |
|  what the REPLYTO kludge is good for  |
|  05 Jan 21 11:18:00  |
 MSGID: 2:310/31.3@fidonet ec21c387 REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ec143148 PID: OpenXP/5.0.48 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: 0000 Hello August! *** Sunday 03.01.21 at 09:19, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster: O>>> I still don't understand what the REPLYTO kludge is good for O>>> in this case. MF>> It's used for netmail replies to echomail messages MF>> originating on the Telegram side of the gateway. AA> Perhaps we can reserve the term gateway to systems that are truly AA> insecure like usenet. The Telegram solution that Stas has built AA> is limited to itself; the general public cannot access those AA> messages unless specifically participating as "known" users. AA> Unlike usenet, it is not possible to be a lurker as you can be in AA> fidonet or usenet. AA> Carol's analogy of the Telegram "system" as an OLR solution is AA> better. No one thinks of OLR's as gateways. ;) OK, perhaps it would have been better and more accurate if I'd said "originating on Telegram Messenger" instead of saying "originating on the Telegram side of the gateway". Regards, Martin --- OpenXP 5.0.48 * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:310/31.3) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 154/10 203/0 221/0 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 1016 1017 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/110 206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 310/31 280/464 229/101 426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]