Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2194  |
|  August Abolins to Chuck Pierson  |
|  yyyy/mm/dd  |
|  10 Jan 21 09:00:00  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ec4ca0ec REPLY: 2:221/6.0 5f7387d2 PID: OpenXP/5.0.48 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0500 Hello Chuck! ** On Tuesday 29.09.20 - 22:15, Chuck Pierson wrote to August Abolins: >> Thanks for pointing that out. I recently paid closer attention to >> what my online banking system uses, invoices, and what the gov't >> prefers. Bank = dd/mm/yyyy. Statments = mm/dd/yyyy Gov't = >> yyyy/mm/dd CP> Strange. In the US, most people and places use mm/dd/yyyy. In the CP> military, we used dd/mm/yyyy. I got used to it, which helped me later. CP> I worked in the oil and gas industry for years, and had communicated CP> internationally a lot. Dates could have been confusing there. I think yyyy/mm/dd makes the most sense. It resembles the way an odometer works or how any other click counter works, or how the incremental numbering system works in general. I've worked with the MIL-STD docs for the Standard Electronic Modules Program (SEMP). That is where I first noticed the consistent and sensible use of dd/ mm/yyyy. (like an odometer in reverse) Looking at some of those MIL-STD docs brings back a lot of memories. My work pertained to the electrical requirements of the modules. Start with MIL-STD 1389C and begin the journey of standard pointing to standard pointing to standard pointing to standard... (arghh) -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.48 * Origin: :) :D :O :( :[ ;) 8) B) :> |I :P =) :S :B :] :\ (2:221/1.58) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 154/10 203/0 221/1 SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 1016 1017 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/110 206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/101 426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]