Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2200  |
|  August Abolins to Jay Harris  |
|  Re: SciNet Point  |
|  11 Jan 21 10:38:47  |
 TZUTC: -0800 MSGID: 528.fido-points@1:153/757.2 2461d347 REPLY: 1:229/664 3ecfe768 PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/58bf7fb4c Jan 11 2021 GCC 10.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.12-Linux master/58bf7fb4c Jan 11 2021 GCC 10.2.0 BBSID: TRMB CHRS: ASCII 1 > On 10 Jan 2021, Tommi Koivula said the following... > > TK> I just sent you netmail crash from OpenXP. > That one came through & I see it in my netmail base. Also replied as a > test. > + Jan 10 11:07:41 Process: Importing EchoMail > + Jan 10 11:07:41 Waiting for BUSY nodes > + Jan 10 11:07:41 Importing 10180736.PKT (2:221/1.2 to 1:229/664) > + Jan 10 11:07:41 Netmail from Tommi Koivula (2:221/1.2) to Jay Harris > (1:229/664) > + Jan 10 11:07:41 Results: 0 echo, 1 net, 0 dupes, 0 tossed in 0.09s Interesting. So, why was it failing when I did the same thing before that? Did you tweak something in the meantime? Maybe we can get Martin Foster to send a test a crash netmail too. Or.. I could assign myself a temp address like 1:999/9999 (or one of the temporary ones in the nodelist) and send you a packet to investigate? --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 106/127 120/340 123/131 124/5016 153/105 SEEN-BY: 153/135 141 757 802 6809 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 SEEN-BY: 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 1016 1017 240/5832 249/110 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 267/67 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 8125 SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/17 200 396/45 423/81 120 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2452/250 3634/12 4500/1 PATH: 153/757 221/6 1 280/464 229/101 426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]