Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2425  |
|  August Abolins to Martin Foster  |
|  de.komm.software.kreuzungspunkt  |
|  18 Mar 21 08:41:00  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ee88234d REPLY: 2:310/31.3@fidonet ee8a22df PID: OpenXP/5.0.49 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0400 Hello Martin! ** On Thursday 18.03.21 - 11:44, you wrote to me: AA>> I found another online translator. Here is the TOC using DeepL: AA>> I Basics AA>> 1.1 FidoNet - structure and addressing AA>> 1.2 Point in FidoNet AA>> 1.3 The nodelist(s) [...] AA>> "Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)" AA>> Do you see anything amiss above? MF> Nope, that's an excellent job. Is that exactly as it came MF> out or did you do a bit of tickling up? That's the exact result, with indenting. Mind you, since the original had indenting and added spacing, the proper spacing in the restul was noticeable after a cut'n'paste into Notpad or this wider editor space. MF> I'm asking because I tried it out with a short paragraph MF> and it came out looking like a dog's dinner. Was your test with DeepL? AA>> I would suggest that we can split the effort.. MF> I would NOT advise using the XPOINT echo for that purpose MF> as it's actually a gated *German* newsgroup. Some sort of MF> versioning system, such as git or svn, would be a far MF> better way of handling it IMO. Yeh, I guess the "de." part in "de.comm.software.crosspoint" would be a clue. :/ But the rest of the name is english. I mean, it's not like it's "komm.software.kreuzungspunkt" :D Personaly, I like the idea of managing a translation discussion with OXP, the product underdiscussion itself. The built in search and threading would make it easy to follow a development. Someone posted a samples of usage of the ftsc documentation in git. https://github.com/zoomosis/ftsc There, it looks pretty straightforward to make editing changes right on the spot and watch the progress. I just learned about TortoiseSVN, since it support Windows. It looks like a fine tool for managing doc changes. But I suppose we would need a webbased versioning system, not a local one for participants/editors? -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.49 * Origin: The ONLY point that matters! --> . <-- (2:221/1.58) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 SEEN-BY: 229/1016 1017 240/2100 5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 249/206 317 SEEN-BY: 249/400 280/464 5003 282/1038 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 PATH: 221/1 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]