home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2960 
 Alan Beck to Dan Clough 
 Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations 
 02 Jun 23 21:40:29 
 
MSGID: 1:229/426.36 80221d15
CHRS: IBMPC 2
TZUTC: -0300
REPLY: 1075.fido_points@1:135/115 28df3bf3
//Hello Dan,//

I find your point comelling.

What software do you use as a terminal to get the mail.

I am very interested in that.

Alan


on *6/2/2023* at *13:50:00* You wrote in area *POINTS*
to *Alan Beck* about *"Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations"*.

 -=>> Alan Beck wrote to Dan Clough <=-

 DC>> 1.  What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing
 DC>> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader.  I operate a BBS,
 DC>> and have used offline mail readers for years.  Just wondering how/if a
 DC>> point would be "better" in some way.  What can it do for me that I can't
 DC>> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)?

 AB>> Being a point is great, you just poll your bossnode and the mail comes
 AB>> in, easy peasy.

 DC> Yes, I understand that.  But it's also easy to grab a QWK packet from
 DC> (my) BBS and read/reply that way.  So... point has no advantage there.

 DC>> 2.  I'm interested (only) in software for Linux.  A glance through the
 DC>> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point
 DC>> software of choice.  Pretty much true?  Any alternatives to that?

 AB>> Explore WinPoint, I use it and love it. You have to wrestle with font
 AB>> size but after that it is OK.

 AB>> At first glance  it looks like a real email program with a full screen.

 AB>> In winpoint you can focus the message window and navigate using the
 AB>> arrow keys. I like that very much.

 AB>> you need a Bossnode to start with, unless you are one.

 AB>> You can reconfigure Winpoint as often as you like, untill you get it.

 DC> Ummmm.... did you miss the part above where I said I was only interested
 DC> in Linux software?

 AB>> you won't need to qwk again.

 DC> I like using QWK, and the whole point of my questions is to find out if
 DC> operating as a Point would be any better.  So far I've not seen any
 DC> indication of that.

 DC> Thanks for your reply...



 DC> ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
 DC> === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 DC> --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 DC>  * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)

Regards,
Alan Beck
--- WinPoint 415.0
 * Origin: Another Random *WinPoint* Origin! (1:229/426.36)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 123/131 129/305 153/7715 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 266/512 282/1038 291/111 292/854 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848
PATH: 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca