Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2961  |
|  Dan Clough to Alan Beck  |
|  Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations  |
|  02 Jun 23 21:16:00  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1077.fido_points@1:135/115 28dfde1f REPLY: 1:229/426.36 80221d15 PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/e54bed451 May 6 2023 GCC 11.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/e54bed451 May 6 2023 GCC 11.2.0 BBSID: PALANTIR CHRS: ASCII 1 -=> Alan Beck wrote to Dan Clough <=- DC>> 1. What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing DC>> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader. I operate a BBS, DC>> and have used offline mail readers for years. Just wondering how/if a DC>> point would be "better" in some way. What can it do for me that I can't DC>> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)? AB>> Being a point is great, you just poll your bossnode and the mail comes AB>> in, easy peasy. DC> Yes, I understand that. But it's also easy to grab a QWK packet from DC> (my) BBS and read/reply that way. So... point has no advantage there. DC>> 2. I'm interested (only) in software for Linux. A glance through the DC>> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point DC>> software of choice. Pretty much true? Any alternatives to that? AB>> Explore WinPoint, I use it and love it. You have to wrestle with font AB>> size but after that it is OK. |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]