Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 38621  |
|  Joseph Pereira to All  |
|  Lawsuit against former FBI chief  |
|  21 Nov 25 06:54:41  |
 TZUTC: -0600 MSGID: 36854.fido_politics@1:124/5016 2d862707 PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0 BBSID: EOTLBBS CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105 Trump has initiated a lawsuit against the former FBI chief. All to create distractions from the Epstein files and failed economic policies. This lawsuit is remarkable because it's being conducted by a prosecutor who may not even be a prosecutor. Her appointment by the government may be illegal. Moreover, she is completely inexperienced. Not only that, but taking on this case required multiple prosecutors. In her own district, not a single prosecutor was willing to take it on because they considered the charges frivolous. A case like that for nothing can cost a prosecutor a career. So she had to shop around, and in another district, there were a few prosecutors who were willing to take it on. To finalize the case, a grand jury had to approve the indictments. There were three indictments. The grand jury approved two of the three. Then you have to compile a new list of indictments that is fully supported by the grand jury. The Trump-appointed, and possibly illegal, prosecutor didn't do that, but merely removed the unaccepted indictment and forwarded that part to the judge. Not only that, but she also mistakenly sent the first indictment, containing the three counts, to the judge. That first indictment, containing the three counts, was therefore not accepted by the grand jury. The second was never presented to the grand jury, which is unheard of. I don't see how this case can ever be taken seriously considering how clumsily and stupidly constructed the entire case is. The grand jury may have approved the two indictments, but the case itself is so shady, so flawed, that it could never lead to a conviction, even if a judge were to accept all the prosecutor's mistakes. This costs enormous amounts of money and achieves absolutely nothing. How much money can be allowed to continue to be spent in the US to distract from the Epstein case? . --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/0 5016 128/187 SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 SEEN-BY: 218/810 840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 300 307 SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464 291/111 292/854 SEEN-BY: 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 SEEN-BY: 902/26 5075/35 PATH: 124/5016 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]