home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 38621 
 Joseph Pereira to All 
 Lawsuit against former FBI chief 
 21 Nov 25 06:54:41 
 
TZUTC: -0600
MSGID: 36854.fido_politics@1:124/5016 2d862707
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0
BBSID: EOTLBBS
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105

Trump has initiated a lawsuit against the former FBI chief. All to create
distractions from the Epstein files and failed economic policies.

This lawsuit is remarkable because it's being conducted by a prosecutor who
may not even be a prosecutor. Her appointment by the government may be illegal.

Moreover, she is completely inexperienced.

Not only that, but taking on this case required multiple prosecutors. In her
own district, not a single prosecutor was willing to take it on because they
considered the charges frivolous. A case like that for nothing can cost a
prosecutor a career. So she had to shop around, and in another district, there
were a few prosecutors who were willing to take it on.

To finalize the case, a grand jury had to approve the indictments. There were
three indictments. The grand jury approved two of the three.

Then you have to compile a new list of indictments that is fully supported by
the grand jury. The Trump-appointed, and possibly illegal, prosecutor didn't
do that, but merely removed the unaccepted indictment and forwarded that part
to the judge.

Not only that, but she also mistakenly sent the first indictment, containing
the three counts, to the judge.

That first indictment, containing the three counts, was therefore not accepted
by the grand jury. The second was never presented to the grand jury, which is
unheard of.

I don't see how this case can ever be taken seriously considering how clumsily
and stupidly constructed the entire case is. The grand jury may have approved
the two indictments, but the case itself is so shady, so flawed, that it could
never lead to a conviction, even if a judge were to accept all the
prosecutor's mistakes.

This costs enormous amounts of money and achieves absolutely nothing. How much
money can be allowed to continue to be spent in the US to distract from the
Epstein case?

 .
--- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux
 * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/0 5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 610 700
SEEN-BY: 218/810 840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 300 307
SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464 291/111 292/854
SEEN-BY: 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848
SEEN-BY: 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 124/5016 218/700 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca