Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 36  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Jason Bock  |
|  Re: PROBOARD Echo Rules  |
|  07 Feb 25 11:56:09  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: CP850 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306 MSGID: 2:280/464 67a5e7c8 REPLY: 1.fidonet_proboard@1:267/310 2b45b027 *** Answering a msg posted in area BAD_MSGS. Hi Jason, On 2024-09-10 12:56:06, you wrote to All: JB> AREA:PROBOARD JB> @FMAIL BAD: Message too old (2025-02-07 02:50:44) JB> @FMAIL SRC: 1:396/45 JB> @FMAIL DEST: 2:280/464 JB> @TZUTC: -0400 JB> @MSGID: 1.fidonet_proboard@1:267/310 2b45b027 JB> @PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928 JB> @TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928 JB> @COLS: 80 JB> @BBSID: SILICONU JB> @CHRS: ASCII 1 JB> @NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104 JB> @DATE: 10 Sep 24 12:56:06 JB> The FidoNet PROBOARD Echo Rules JB> Updated 9 September 2024 ... JB> @PATH: 267/310 800 311 266/512 229/426 396/45 This message ended up in my BAD area, because of the message date. Was it held up somewhere? Or did something else go wrong? Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 18/200 50/22 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/305 SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/110 114 206 317 400 426 428 470 550 664 700 705 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 266/512 267/310 280/464 291/111 292/854 301/1 310/31 320/219 SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 460/58 256 1124 633/280 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]