Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 331  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins  |
|  Re: pgp memories and diskettes  |
|  03 Jan 20 22:05:57  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 5e0facb6 REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e0f9dd6 Hi August, On 2020-01-03 22:02:34, you wrote to me: AA> The one at MIT (which sounds like where I would have submitted my key) AA> but fails with this: AA> --[begin]-- AA> Proxy Error AA> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. AA> The proxy server could not handle the request GET /pks/lookup. AA> Reason: Error reading from remote server AA> --[end]-- AA> I didn't expect that from the great MIT. I get the same error there... WvV>> Afaik most key-servers are connected to each other these days, WvV>> and exchange keys on a regular basis. So if your key is out WvV>> there, it might be "everywhere". AA> Yes.. I notice that keys are now pooled and distributed to other servers. AA> Things have certainly changed since I first started with PGP in the 90's. AA> I looked with a few listed here: https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ You probably got the same results everywhere, because they are all synced. ;) WvV>> When I search for "abolins" on my (default) key-server it finds WvV>> 27 keys as old as from 1994. But none include a mention WvV>> of "august". AA> Are they *all* from 1994? Nope, only the last one. This is the list I get: https://pgp.surfnet.nl/pks/lookup?search=abolins&fingerprint=on&op=index AA> 1994 sounds about right when I actually submitted to a server. I AA> found about the same number of references to abolins as you at a few AA> random servers from the sks link above. I am surprised that I wouldn't AA> have included my FN. I wonder if the last entry in one of those AA> searches could be it! AA> pub 512R/246249F7 1994-02-16 AA> The DATE and bit size certainly looks right. 1994 is about the last time I AA> actually used pgp. And, I am pretty sure the key signature was small before AA> I learned about the benefits of larger ones. I get that same one in my list, but I don't think it's compatible with modern gpg2 that I use. I can import it from the keyserver: wilfred@wilnux5:~/tmp> gpg --recv-keys 246249F7 gpg: requesting key 246249F7 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net gpg: key 246249F7: no user ID gpg: Total number processed: 1 But afterwards it can't be listed: wilfred@wilnux5:~/tmp> gpg -kv 246249F7 gpg: using PGP trust model gpg: can't handle public key algorithm 22 gpg: can't handle public key algorithm 18 gpg: error reading key: No public key AA> This is what I did with a bunch of 3 1/2 diskettes a few years ago: AA> http://kolico.ca/fidonet/echos/win95/index.html#diskettes You have too much time! ;) AA> As an aside: I like the "status" page at AA> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ AA> It would be fun to see a similar live version of something like that AA> for the modest 900 IP nodes. ..But I digress. Fun for some, but painfull for others: It would embarrass a lot of hosts, because it would show how bad their segments are maintained in the nodelist... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]