Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 343  |
|  August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  scrap key for ID 5789589B  |
|  04 Jan 20 19:37:35  |
 MSGID: 2:221/360.0 5e10cd5a REPLY: 2:280/464 5e10bf63 PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20191208 TID: GE/2 1.2 CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: 0200 On 04/01/2020 11:31 a.m., Wilfred van Velzen : August Abolins wrote: WvV> It's not necessary to "scrap" a key, just because the "uid" WvV> (user ID) is no longer relevant. WvV> You can add additional (new) uid's, you can delete uid's (but WvV> that won't remove them from keys on keyservers), and you can WvV> revoke uid's. I am not sure I can tie a proper (non-padded) email address to the one I messed up with the program I am using. I'm pretty new to the process. I have to figure out the right rhythm and steps. If you were to create an email to me using my current key, would you have to remove the R_E_M_O_V_E part manually each and every time? WvV> For instance my 9611AC4F key (which is on the keyservers), has WvV> 3 active uid's (with current email addresses), and 3 revoked WvV> uid's (with email address I no longer use)... Yes, I pulled that one down. It has 5 "Also known as" email addresses. Key management could be a nightmare across multiple devices. It's pretty neat that I can look up old friends and check the properties of the keys. --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 hunderbird/60.9.1 * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0) SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 227/114 229/426 SEEN-BY: 229/1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]