Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 355  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  test  |
|  04 Jan 20 23:08:50  |
 REPLY: 2:280/464 5e10fd30 MSGID: 2:221/1 5e10ff4b CHRS: CP850 2 TZUTC: 0200 TID: hpt/os2-emx 1.9.0-cur 2019-12-05 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 04 Jan 20 22:00, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Tommi Koivula: WV> Hi Tommi, WV> On 2020-01-04 22:22:45, you wrote to me: >>> TK> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- TK> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> I'm wondering why yours uses SHA256 and mine uses SHA1. SHA1 is the >>> more compatibel one with older versions, but is less secure... TK>> Hmm.. No idea.. WV> You don't have anything in you gpg.conf ? Nope. Maybe it is how the key was initially created? WV> Maybe thunderbird forces it? I don't think so... I'll sign this one with Golded. 'Tommi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEQTJnraOsQBoYwCPS0ikymSpvgioFAl4Q/0oRHHRvbW1pQHJi Yi5iYnMuZmkACgkQ0ikymSpvgiqwUAgAmjRIGH7yG4TrQCDafDksLeMVe0Xm/YyW VmGN5LIJ42znECV6RLsxo+JuxFqbOxru+QTstqUzjIkuNWKvSpNkOVx+pMN+BSXz kAfy1WTbr7jmA+i1k9wnWyAbMobPffpgIK4TGRi2MGqRFEBzFOXNH2tVAhDVSXe3 y3yIMw7EkHnMFv39S8RBdVyJZ/5N2WPCMd6T5ub+TeAVudOqn8OThw9R04AkMBsx HgddGQIdJt4GSWCWeWyRAItENfKV1QmiaX89dAWQCs8xggwrXew75OvGEKk+yffT tfdEFmcwKBo/u7VzvWQc8jbwiez2+tHi6mNXwdcLM+2GkY1ZR6xywA== =lvUq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:cb0:f1d0:2:221:1 (2:221/1) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 360 227/114 229/426 1014 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]