Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 396  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins  |
|  Re: enc + netmail  |
|  05 Jan 20 17:27:07  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 5e120e5f REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e1204cc Hi August, On 2020-01-05 17:46:25, you wrote to me: AA>>> Next to being able to sign messages in echomail/newsgroups, AA>>> fully encrypted messages only make sense in email - direct AA>>> to a specific individual. WvV>> Or routed netmail! AA> But we really don't know the exact route a netmail will take. Nope. AA> For a user, unless they analyze the nodelist or confirm things with AA> their sysop, netmail is unreliable. Indeed. But I doubt many systems still filter-out/bounce netmail with encrypted content. AA> I also use point-software (OpenXP) which allows sending crash mail. AA> With that, I could crash my encrypted netmail to its final destination AA> with confidence to any system that flies the U,ENC flags. And in case of a point as destination of which the boss has the ENC flag. You can crash the encrypted netmail at the boss's system... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]