Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 429  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins  |
|  Re: Key update w/photo  |
|  07 Jan 20 10:34:48  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 5e1450ba REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e029177c *** Answering a msg posted in area PKEY_DROP. Hi August, On 2020-01-06 20:23:00, you wrote to me: AA> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- AA> Charset: ISO-8859-1 AA> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ [Partly decoded and quoted ;)] AA> I was unable to send an encrypted reply between us in echomail. Yes you were!? But you didn't sign this message... AA> BTW, If it *did* work, I wonder if that would be a violation of the AA> echo rules. :( Yes, but I think a onetime experiment should be ok. AA> Personally, I think this is neat (in echomail) but if anyone else were AA> to get no access to encrypted messages in echomail, being the messages AA> are just between a just a few people, then it may as well be via AA> email, and not be copied/echoed to multiple fidonet systems. It defeats the purpose of echomail, so besides some experimentation, you should send encrypted echomail... AA> But thanks for proving that it can be done. I am not sure if I can AA> duplicate success with another editor. You just did with @PID: OpenXP/5.0.42 (Win32). ;) Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]