TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: UTF-8 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
MSGID: 2:280/464 5e1452bc
REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e13c4e2
Hi August,

On 2020-01-07 01:38:14, you wrote to me:

 WvV>> You could do some tests, sending encrypted and non-
 WvV>> encrypted routed netmails through the net. But you will
 WvV>> have to find volunteer destinations in all far away corners
 WvV>> of the nodelist. ;)

 AA> For starters, the ENC flag seems to be flown in Z2 systems only.

Your right. Strange... Maybe they are filtered from the segments before they
make it in the published nodelist?

 AA> So, it is unlikely that anyone in Z1 would like to participate.

I wouldn't draw that conclusion just from what is in the nodelist. ;)

 AA> But it could be interesting which non-ENC systems let the messages
 AA> pass through.

That's the whole purpose of the test: Find out which systems on "all" possible
routes still filter/bounce encrypted netmail.

 AA> Nah.. best to stick with known systems that show ENC.

It isn't the destinations we are testing but the systems along the routes...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832
SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757
SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250
PATH: 280/464 229/426