Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 518  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins  |
|  Re: GOOD for you, BAD for me  |
|  11 Jan 20 18:24:15  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 5e1a04ee REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e1a01f4 Hi August, On 2020-01-11 19:12:27, you wrote to me: AA>>> What made it report BAD for me? It was exactly the same pub key AA>>> pair between us. The exact time and date proved that. WvV>> So if the keys weren't the problem. Something must have changed WvV>> in the plain text that was signed, before it reached you, that WvV>> made it fail the verify... AA> So, when it says "BAD signature", it's talking about the signature of AA> the message? Yes. AA> Hmmm. A single char difference (maybe the odd =20 char) gets AA> introduced) and messes up the "signature" of the message. Yes. AA> I see that happening when I need to copy/paste the contents of a PGP AA> block and paste it into my BlackBerry's pgp decryptor window. It always AA> seem to return an error and never decrypts. Ok... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]