Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 755  |
|  August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  Re: tutanota/protonmail/gmail compared  |
|  26 Jun 21 10:45:37  |
 TZUTC: -0700 MSGID: 104.fido-publicke@1:153/757.2 253c9e29 REPLY: 2:280/464 60d6ee0c PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/4a82e0248 Jun 20 2021 GCC 10.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/4a82e0248 Jun 20 2021 GCC 10.3.0 BBSID: TRMB CHRS: ASCII 1 > AA> https://tweaklibrary.com/tutanota-vs-protonmail-vs-gmail/ > Yes interesting! I never heard of the other two before (beside gmail). > Although I value my privacy, I'm not going to switch, too much work... ;) I too thought that adding Gmail into the discussion was weird and not a valid comparison to the other "secure" systems. But the inclusion is educational. Tutanota was a new one for me, only a few months ago. It's 1GB space vs Protonmail's 500MB is pretty good. I've been with Protonmail for at least 6 years now, and have 25GB used space, primarily due to the Sent folder keeping copies I probably no longer need. No need to switch.. just try to embrace the alternative gradually. > But good to know there are alternatives for gmail. The inventor of Protonmail has a short TedTalk about it. Again, some comparisons to the non-secure systems were made. --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2) SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 134/100 153/105 SEEN-BY: 153/135 250 757 802 154/10 203/0 220/70 221/0 1 6 226/17 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017 240/5832 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038 288/100 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 322/757 335/364 340/1000 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/220 230 2452/250 PATH: 153/757 770/1 280/464 292/854 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]