home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 771 
 August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen 
 Safester, anyone? 
 29 Jan 22 09:12:00 
 
MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f8e44f3a
REPLY: 2:280/464 61f41203
PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32)
CHRS: ASCII 1
TZUTC: -0500
Hello Wilfred van Velzen!

** On Friday 28.01.22 - 16:51, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins:

 WvV> No Linux DT version?

Yes.. there is.
See https://safester.net/install_linux/
[Debian 7+, RHEL 5.5+, Ubuntu 12.04+]


 AA>> They do however store the passphrase using a SHA-1
 AA>> hashcode.  I thought SHA-1 was depricated.

 WvV> It is considered no longer safe, afaik...

But does it matter so much if the keymanagement is local on the  
client?

However, it is somewhat astonishing that SHA-1 was/is even used  
in the design.


 WvV> An attacker with enough resources could in theory find
 WvV> some or all passwords. And of course that becomes
 WvV> progressively easier in the future...

I am not impressed with the reports that people can process  
millions of hashes per second using dedicated GPUs.  So what if  
the hashes are decoded. They can't do anything with them to  
target millions of people enmasse anyway. I think they would  
have to target SPECIFIC accounts and run the passwords one by  
one.

In Safester, the decoded hash would reveal the passphrase, but  
the decrypting of the messages would be useless without the  
user's key which would reside in the local Safester prog or  
app.

 AA>> Safester *is* different operationally.  It doesn't use
 AA>> the internet email system. Messages are only between
 AA>> client/server/ client.

 WvV> So you can only exchange messages with other Safester
 WvV> users.

Yeah.  :(  But it's not as bad as it sounds!  ;)   I think that  
may be better than forcing people to try DeltaChat as a 1st- 
time venture into secure communications.

 WvV> You're not a good sales person for Safester! Because all
 WvV> the things you mention make me not want to use it! ;-)

As you, I was convinced that it is not a good system (compared  
to operating an OpenGPG-based system like gpg manually,  
Kleopatra, WinGPG, etc.) and having total control.  But now,  
giving it a bit of a go, it seems to be a fine "environment" to  
introduce people to the value of secure/private comms.  It  
looks like regular email (subject, full dates, address book  
management, wordprocessing tools like bold/italic, bullets,  
printing, creating subfolders, blocking "forwarding", ..and my  
favourite: S)earch by subject or body.

--
  ../|ug
--- OpenXP 5.0.51
 * Origin: Key ID = 0x5789589B (2:221/1.58)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 30/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/330
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 424 426 664 700 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/0 1 101 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 423/81 460/58 712/848
PATH: 221/1 301/1 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca