Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 771  |
|  August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  Safester, anyone?  |
|  29 Jan 22 09:12:00  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f8e44f3a REPLY: 2:280/464 61f41203 PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0500 Hello Wilfred van Velzen! ** On Friday 28.01.22 - 16:51, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins: WvV> No Linux DT version? Yes.. there is. See https://safester.net/install_linux/ [Debian 7+, RHEL 5.5+, Ubuntu 12.04+] AA>> They do however store the passphrase using a SHA-1 AA>> hashcode. I thought SHA-1 was depricated. WvV> It is considered no longer safe, afaik... But does it matter so much if the keymanagement is local on the client? However, it is somewhat astonishing that SHA-1 was/is even used in the design. WvV> An attacker with enough resources could in theory find WvV> some or all passwords. And of course that becomes WvV> progressively easier in the future... I am not impressed with the reports that people can process millions of hashes per second using dedicated GPUs. So what if the hashes are decoded. They can't do anything with them to target millions of people enmasse anyway. I think they would have to target SPECIFIC accounts and run the passwords one by one. In Safester, the decoded hash would reveal the passphrase, but the decrypting of the messages would be useless without the user's key which would reside in the local Safester prog or app. AA>> Safester *is* different operationally. It doesn't use AA>> the internet email system. Messages are only between AA>> client/server/ client. WvV> So you can only exchange messages with other Safester WvV> users. Yeah. :( But it's not as bad as it sounds! ;) I think that may be better than forcing people to try DeltaChat as a 1st- time venture into secure communications. WvV> You're not a good sales person for Safester! Because all WvV> the things you mention make me not want to use it! ;-) As you, I was convinced that it is not a good system (compared to operating an OpenGPG-based system like gpg manually, Kleopatra, WinGPG, etc.) and having total control. But now, giving it a bit of a go, it seems to be a fine "environment" to introduce people to the value of secure/private comms. It looks like regular email (subject, full dates, address book management, wordprocessing tools like bold/italic, bullets, printing, creating subfolders, blocking "forwarding", ..and my favourite: S)earch by subject or body. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.51 * Origin: Key ID = 0x5789589B (2:221/1.58) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 30/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/330 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 317 SEEN-BY: 229/400 424 426 664 700 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/0 1 101 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/81 460/58 712/848 PATH: 221/1 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]