Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2355  |
|  hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to John Albert  |
|  Re: Cab Signal safety--1951  |
|  03 Nov 16 11:32:00  |
 On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:47:44 PM UTC-4, John Albert wrote: > Cab signals and speed control (until the Metro-North > accident) applied ONLY to signal indications (i.e., would > apply brakes if engineman did not take appropriate action > after passing a more restrictive signal indication). > > After the Spyten Duyvil wreck, Metro-North installed cab > signal "drops" approaching certain speed restrictions. These > operate independently of signal indications. However, it sounds to be relatively trivial to install a slower signal at a serious speed restriction to force a slowdown, as MetroNorth did. Simply change the most permissive aspect on a signal from proceed to a slower speed. It also seems rather simple to add on more aspects than the 1951 technology; I think its fastest was 45 mph for approach limited. --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]