Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2487  |
|  Sancho Panza to Stephen Sprunk  |
|  Re: more fuzzy math, was National FREIGH  |
|  08 Apr 14 19:42:02  |
 From: otterpower@xhotmail.com On 4/8/2014 7:30 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > On 08-Apr-14 18:13, Sancho Panza wrote: >> On 4/8/2014 7:04 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: >>> On 08-Apr-14 16:18, Sancho Panza wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2014 3:04 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: >>>>> It's trains running on your beloved _freight_ network that lose >>>>> enormous >>>>> amounts of money, almost entirely due to lack of capital investment, >>>>> which hurts both passenger _and_ freight service. >>>>> >>>> On the contrary, Union Pacific stock has been quite a strong performer >>>> for the last several years, and Burlington Northern has not been one of >>>> Berkshire Hathaway's shabbier contributors, either. >>> >>> They don't run passenger trains, except under contracts where they're >>> guaranteed to turn a profit regardless of performance. >>> >> No one said they did. The response was your assertion about losing money >> on the freight network, which is overwhelmingly involved in moving freight. > > That I was referring to passenger trains was obvious, at least until you > snipped the context so you could deliberately misinterpret it. And that ties together strong financial performance with "lack of capital investment" how? --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]