Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2510  |
|  hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Stephen Sprunk  |
|  Re: Atomic powered trains  |
|  13 Apr 14 14:32:06  |
 On Sunday, April 13, 2014 4:39:49 PM UTC-4, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > Nukes have high fixed costs and low variable costs, so you want to run them at full power 24x7. ... I don't understand. All that means is that if you reduce output, you're not saving all that much money in fuel costs. But by your statement, you then must spend money to absorb excess power. So, it seems simpler just to put in the control rods and run at reduced power during slack times. Peaking plants, such as turbines, have the advantage of quick start and relatively low cpaital cost, but are very expensive to run. --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]