Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2517  |
|  Stephen Sprunk to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com  |
|  Re: Atomic powered trains  |
|  14 Apr 14 13:19:22  |
 From: stephen@sprunk.org On 13-Apr-14 16:32, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > On Sunday, April 13, 2014 4:39:49 PM UTC-4, Stephen Sprunk wrote: >> Nukes have high fixed costs and low variable costs, so you want to >> run them at full power 24x7. ... > > I don't understand. All that means is that if you reduce output, > you're not saving all that much money in fuel costs. You save a little on fuel, but that's a negligible cost overall. > But by your statement, you then must spend money to absorb excess > power. You don't want to "absorb" excess power; you want to shift it from off-peak periods to peak periods, which can be done relatively cheaply and easily with pumped storage. That keeps your expensive nuke operating (and making profits) 24x7 yet allows you to vary _net_ output to match demand. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]