Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2626  |
|  Stephen Sprunk to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com  |
|  Re: OT: NYC apt complex for sale; govern  |
|  14 May 14 17:37:36  |
 From: stephen@sprunk.org On 14-May-14 10:07, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > This is off topic, but it shows the difference in attitudes of > various parts of the country. > > In NYC, a large apartment complex is up for sale. Historically, the > complex had modestly priced apartments thanks to certain tax > concessions from the city. Now the owners are trying to make the > complex market-rate, with many residents objecting. > > I can't help but suspect that in cities in the southwest large > apartments don't have this kind of mishigosh. No, because we don't have rent control. If there isn't enough housing, rents go up, the invisible hand of the market creates more housing, and rents go back down. We also have much higher property taxes, so there is a strong incentive to either do something productive with your land or sell it to someone who will. In contrast, speculators can sit on NYC property worth millions of dollars for decades and pay _nothing_ in taxes, and keeping that property idle forces up rents on the speculators' other properties, which is a big part of why NYC "needs" rent control in the first place! If NYC charged real property taxes on _every_ property (idle or not) and got rid of rent control, the housing "problem" would solve itself within a few years--and they could get rid of their income tax at the same time and still have a huge budget surplus to boot, which could be spent on hundreds of other things that NYC desperately needs to improve/replace. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]