Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2628  |
|  Sancho Panza to Stephen Sprunk  |
|  Re: Penna giving more authority to cops   |
|  14 May 14 19:20:48  |
 From: otterpower@xhotmail.com On 5/14/2014 6:22 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > On 14-May-14 15:13, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: >> While this pertains to highways, it can have an adverse impact on >> railroad passengers and ordinary pedestrians, too. Under the new >> law, you can be arrested even if you're not carrying contraband. > > You are grossly exaggerating this. > > This law only criminalized having a "secret compartment" in your vehicle > that the police can establish (beyond a reasonable doubt) is "intended" > to be used to carry contraband. Basically, the goal is to be able to > nail smugglers on return trips when the compartment is empty--assuming > you're not smuggling things in both directions. > >> The 'probable cause' to be stopped is made easy, too. > > You are grossly exaggerating this as well. > > Cops never needed "probable cause" to stop you; they only need > "reasonable suspicion". And the standard for "probable cause" hasn't > changed one bit; all that this law does is allow warrantless searches of > a vehicle when the cops have probable cause, which many other states and > the federal govt already allow--and many courts in PA also already > allowed due to existing PA law not being clear on the matter. In essence, having a hidden compartment to safeguard valuables like money or jewelry while traveling is now a crime. What next, ehyes looking left or right or up or down? --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]