Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2631  |
|  Larry Sheldon to rcp27g@gmail.com  |
|  Re: Idjit Engine Inquiry (was Re: Maybe   |
|  15 May 14 03:33:18  |
 From: lfsheldon@gmail.com On 5/15/2014 3:19 AM, rcp27g@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, 15 May 2014 06:20:03 UTC+2, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> On 5/14/2014 10:56 PM, Glen Labah wrote: >> >>> The other interesting thing is that if you look at some of the photos of >>> the yards >>> http://www.noarail.com/members2/v/John+ll/Working+Steam/EAR02.jpg.html >>> the track spacing seems somewhat wider than necessary. Maybe someone >>> had the idea that someday conversion to standard gauge might happen? >> >> For the terminally uninformed--what is in the structure in front of the >> boiler in that picture? I do not believe I have ever seen such a thing. > > It's a relatively conventional Beyer-Garratt locomotive. The concept is that the boiler is suspended between two engine-units, the "rear" engine unit carries the fuel and some water, the "front" engine unit has a water tank (to supply the boiler, I say front and rear in quotes because the locomotives are designed to be used equally well in either direction), and there is no separate tender. Ohe benefit is that the boiler has no wheels or running gear beneath it, so it can be of large diameter, and can sit lower than would be possible with driving wheels beneath it, which is useful for stability on narrow gauge track. In general it provides for a large and powerful locomotive on a light axle loading that can cope with narrow gauge track with tight curvature. Thank you so much. It looks like it might be competitive with what so would say is my favorite, the Mallet inverteds of my youth. -- Idioten aangeboden. Gratis af te halen. h/t Dagelijkse Standaard --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]