Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2677  |
|  John Levine to All  |
|  Re: legal esoterica, was Old railway sta  |
|  16 May 14 13:21:00  |
 From: johnl@iecc.com >I can't recall having seen any citations of English cases after 1776, >and I'm pretty sure I'd remember that because I'd recall questioning the >legal authority of such a precedent. In the 1800s the Court cited English law all the time. See, for example, the patent case Pennock & Sellers v. Dialogue - 27 U.S. 1 (1829), where Justice Story discussed the Statute of Monopolies as the legislative antecedent of US patent law, and cites Wood v. Zimmer, 1 Holt's N.P. 58. You can find a copy of the case here: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/27/1/case.html I see from googling around that Jefferson hated the idea of using English law as US precedent, but as so often happened, the country went in a different direction. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]