home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2682 
 conklin to All 
 Re: safety improvements why not for oil  
 16 May 14 19:58:42 
 
From: nilknocgeo@earthlink.net

"JG"  wrote in message
news:ec5bce54-c8e6-45bb-80eb-d1afecaaa954@googlegroups.com...
> On Friday, May 16, 2014 12:19:54 PM UTC-5, conklin wrote:
>>  wrote in message
>>
>> news:4992f897-fa17-41c7-b650-e1b6c2448af6@googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > http://www.mta.info/news/2014/05/15/metro-north-announces-s
eeping-series-safety-reforms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Automated Track Inspection: Metro-North has developed a comprehensive
>>
>> automated track inspection plan. This plan includes the use of track
>>
>> geometry measurements, machine vision track inspection, and rail internal
>>
>> defect testing. These efforts will augment the visual inspections
>> conducted
>>
>> by the railroad. Metro-North is purchasing an autonomous track monitoring
>>
>> system to be mounted on passenger rail cars, to provide continuous
>>
>> information about the condition of the right-of-way. The railroad will
>> also
>>
>> obtain a dedicated track geometry vehicle.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This is what is needed for those 120 car oil trains.  They need a sensors
>> on
>>
>> every oil train.
>
> How about a "dedicated track geometry vehicle" riding a mile ahead of the
> train ?? At least one of those pickup trucks that can ride the rails and
> have the driver inspect for major issues.
>

If Metro-North is taking safety seriously, then it is high time for the
track used by oil trains to be up to the same standard.

--- SoupGate/W32 v1.03
 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca