home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2728 
 Glen Labah to dpeltier@my-deja.com 
 Re: safety improvements why not for oil  
 18 May 14 21:08:48 
 
From: gl4317@yahoo.com

In article
<1150810053422162717.604051dpeltier-my-deja.com@news.aioe.org>,
  wrote:

> "conklin"  wrote:
> > Is the geo car ever put on the end of these 100+car oil trains?  If not,
> > why
> > not?
>
> Because a.) the slack action at the end of a 100-car freight trains is not
> safe for occupied passenger cars, and b.) they want to test as many miles
> per shift as they can, so they want to operate on priority trains. As I
> said, the usual practice is to run them as stand-alone trains.


There is also c.) If it is a track geometry car at the end of a 100+ car
oil train, it will discover any critical safety issues with the track
after the train has already derailed and exploded.

--
Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam due to e-mail address
harvesters on Usenet. Response time to e-mail sent here is slow.

--- SoupGate/W32 v1.03
 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca