From: jock@soccer.com

On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 23:54:19 +0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
 wrote:

>Nobody  wrote:
>>"Adam H. Kerman"  wrote:
>>>Wayne Hines  wrote:
>
>>>>http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/medias-media/avis-advisory/rail/201
/r13d0054-20140805.asp
>
>>>Still waiting for evidence the prosecutor will present in support of his
>>>theory of criminal liability against the three men, or does Quebec simply
>>>not have public prosecutions any more?
>
>>Most criminal charges across the various provincial/territorial
>>juridsdictoins in Canada come under the Crown Attorneys' Office... in
>>Quebec, the Director of Public Prosecutions.
>
>Yes, I know.

Then why did you ask,  "... or does Quebec simply not have public
prosecutions any more?"

>
>>Wonkypedia might help you:
>
>Uh, no, that was useless.
>
>>You're not going to see/hear publicly about evidence till the trial or
>>trials.
>
>Is there no preliminary hearing in Quebec in which the prosecution must
>lay out his case?

As has been outlined in that newspaper report, the next step in the
process is the court appearance in September.  Follow it, and
appeciate that Canada's legal system is not American.

If you read the Wonkpedia entry, you might appreciate that disclosure
from Crown (or defence) is internal, not necessarily public, till
trial/s.

--- SoupGate/W32 v1.03
 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)