Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2921  |
|  Adam H. Kerman to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com  |
|  Re: Gallery car vs. multi-level car?  |
|  17 Aug 14 04:58:18  |
 From: ahk@chinet.com hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: >Just curious--does anyone have an opinion as to the superiority of the >gallery type commuter coach (as used by Chicago railroads) vs. the >multi-level coach as used by NJ Transit, LIRR, etc.? >That is, which are preferred by passengers, which have faster >loading/unloading, which are preferred by crews, ride quality, ease of >maintenance, etc.? >(In my own opinion, I prefer single level cars like NJT's Arrow MUs. >I've never ridden a gallery car, but I feel the multi-levels, while >popular with many, have some disadvantages). The gallery car, now in use in Chicago for 63 years, was designed for two purposes: 1) It fit under the train shed at Chicago Union Station. 2) CB&Q and, later, C&NW and the other railroads, could serve a growing suburban ridership without adding members of the train crew. There's some discussion that loading and unloading through center doors is faster than through end doors, but I'm not sure how that can really be true. C&NW had three stream of passengers with dividers, so that sped things up. We've gotten away from that in cars with wheelchair lifts, which reverted to two streams of passengers. IC Highliners had a modified design. Floor-height board obviously reduced dwell time, large vestibule with a small partition for the conductor to stand behind to make announcements and operate doors, although it's also useable for passengers. In addition, there's boarding at the end door through the engineer's cab when not in use, so that speeds things up. The gallery is smaller on the cab side to accomodate the pantograph. Passengers get used to anything. Only on Usenet have I read gripes about the need to bend to sit beneath the gallery. Oddly, these people don't sit in the gallery; no bending required. With gallery cars, you get a lot more seats versus Toronto-style cars, so that's definitely preferred by passengers. I think dwell time is more of an issue of steps to climb than where the vestibule is. --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]