Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3043  |
|  jimmygeldburg@gmail.com to Stephen Sprunk  |
|  Re: Passenger versus freight was Re: Hoo  |
|  14 Apr 15 11:25:02  |
 Stephen Sprunk wrote: > jimmygeldburg@gmail.com wrote: > > If the vast majority of trains are passenger trains (or freight > > trains that clear high platforms), and a wide freight is a rarity, > > they can leave the flip-down high platform edges deployed most of the > > time, and only retract them before a freight comes through. > > A bridge plate needs support at both ends; it doesn't just hang out in > space by itself. What you're describing is more like a retractable gap > filler, which would extend on arrival and retract before departure; you > wouldn't want to leave it extended between passenger trains and count on > it being retracting remotely before the next freight passed through. No, I was referring to a flip-down platform edge. They have to be flipped manually, which is why they only make sense where the vast majority of traffic is passenger trains and narrow freights. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Reading_MBTA_ tation_mini-high_platform.JPG > Now that the old South Ferry is closed, I'm not sure there are any > remaining examples of such gap fillers in the US. Union Square on the Lexington Avenue IRT. http://www.citytransport.info/NotMine/NYCS_IRT_LexAve_14Sta.jpg Jimmy --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]