Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3045  |
|  hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Stephen Sprunk  |
|  Re: Passenger versus freight  |
|  14 Apr 15 12:10:34  |
 On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 1:28:40 PM UTC-4, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > I'm sure the union has invented other "duties" to justify their > existence, as with any featherbed job, but it's clear from watching that > Amtrak LD is grossly overstaffed, which undoubtedly contributes to them > losing so much money. Would you provide specifics on the union-invented other duties? > You clearly need staff for the snack bar/dining car, but they don't > operate step boxes; they're serving customers even during stops (which > can last an hour or more each, thanks to schedule padding). My own experience is that people do not board a snack or dining car unless it is the type that does have revenue seats, and some do. > You clearly need attendants for the sleepers, but a maximum of one per > car, and probably less than that. AFAIK, there is only one attendant per sleeping car. The private railroads operated with one person per car. > You clearly need at least one person to collect tickets in the coaches, > but less than one per car, and they can do other things after that task > is completed following each stop. > What else do you need? Why is there at least one crewman standing at > _every_ door, in addition to the dozen inside--for a six-car train? > (And that's just the staff on duty, i.e. not counting those sacked out > in the dorm car.) My own experience on Amtrak LD trains is that there are much less crew than you suggest. --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]