home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 21136 
 The Natural Philosopher to Michael Schwingen 
 Re: Pi-FAN for RPi4 with 4 (instead of 3 
 09 Dec 24 15:51:51 
 
INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
REPLYADDR tnp@invalid.invalid
REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
MSGID:  415ad6e4
REPLY:  3ef378b9
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
On 09/12/2024 13:47, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> On 2024-12-09, The Natural Philosopher  wrote:
>>> I was surprised you'd use MTBF for a component which is expected to
>>> steadily deteriorate due to wear and tear.
>>>
>>> I though MTBF was more a random failure thing.
>>>
>> No it isnt that at all.
>
> MTBF is a measure for the rate of failures *during normal lifetime* - ie.
>
> 1 / failure rate
>
> It is *not* the lifetime of a component. MTBF is a measure for failures
> during the flat part of the bathtub curve. Failures due to end of lifetime
> (like normal, not-premature wearout on a fan) are not part of MTBF.
>
Well yes and no. There is no guarantee that the failures will be
(economically) repairable.
MTBF is a stochastic emergent property of a bunch of items all of which
have a lifetime.

A fan has items inside it, like its bearings.


> https://www.vitecpower.com/technische-daten/the-difference-bet
een-mtbf-and-lifetime/

"According to the information provided earlier, the primary distinction
lies in one encompassing the failure rate of all components, while the
other exclusively focuses on the lifespan of electrolytic capacitors."


> https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/why-l10-life-expectancy-
s-key-for-fan-durability-over-mtbf-ratings

This is full of bullshit

"MTBF estimates the lifespan of a fan’s electronic components, expressed
in millions of hours. In contrast, L10 Service Life, measured in
thousands of hours, is based on the durability of the bearings and
lubrication grease."

So a fan with no electronic components has no MTBF?



> https://www.digi.com/support/knowledge-base/understanding-mtbf
mean-time-between-failures
>


"Furthermore, MTBF specifically excludes wear-out factors"


  Total crap.

"Mean time between failures (MTBF) describes the expected time between
two failures for a repairable system. For example, three identical
systems starting to function properly at time 0 are working until all of
them fail. The first system fails after 100 hours, the second after 120
hours and the third after 130 hours. The MTBF of the systems is the
average of the three failure times, which is 116.667 hours. If the
systems were non-repairable, then their MTTF would be 116.667 hours."

"In general, MTBF is the "up-time" between two failure states of a
repairable system during operation "

It is an academic nicety to make a distinction between repairable and
irreparable subsystems.

In a Triggers broom sort of way a replacement is simply a repair of all
components

I could for example clean the cruft out of a seized fan  Or oil its
bearings.  Or completely replace it.

What matters is how long the repair or the new fan will last. Not
splitting hairs over MTTF versus MTBF


--
Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 19/10 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/305
SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 360
SEEN-BY: 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 114 200 206 300 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 550 616 664 700 705 240/1120 266/512 267/800
SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1
SEEN-BY: 770/3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 902/26 5020/400 1042 5075/35
PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca