MSGID: dont-email.me 4956882f
REPLY: dont-email.me df294fc6
TZUTC: 1000
CHRS: CP437 2
REPLYADDR: ldo@nz.invalid
REPLYTO: 3:633/280.2@fidonet UUCP
PID: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih)
TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)
RFC-Message-ID: <109t38m$25qlc$6@dont-email.me>
RFC-From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= 
RFC-References: <109h5bq$309ra$1@dont-email.me> 	 	
<109snd3$21u94$1@dont-email.me>
RFC-Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
RFC-Content-Type: text/plain;
RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
RFC-Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
RFC-Cancel-Lock: sha1:wBvjzRdVrufesm5ReA6br6nrKMo=
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote:

> As Richard says, containers are persistent.

They can be, they need not be. It is entirely possible to mount an 
instance of tmpfs to hold any writable storage, which will disappear as 
soon as the container instance terminates.

--- MBSE BBS v1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)
 * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
SEEN-BY: 19/38 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110
SEEN-BY: 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 200 206 275 300 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 281 418 420 509 2744
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 633/280 229/426