MSGID:  0c19b577
REPLY:  3bbc8a38
PID: PyGate 1.5.2
TID: PyGate/Linux 1.5.2
CHRS: CP437 2
TZUTC: 1100
REPLYADDR c186282@nnada.net
REPLYTO 3:633/10 UUCP
On 12/10/25 00:18, Andy Burns wrote:
> c186282 wrote:
> 
>> If monitoring 'emergency vehicles/installations'
>> ÿÿ is critical, maybe consider something using lower
>> ÿÿ frequencies than wi-fi ???
> 
> Nah, it was mostly "for interest" to gather a few more values from kit 
> that's already being monitored. Someone else mentioned water (presumably 
> as rain) don't forget the fire appliances carry around their own water, 
> but hopefully it's low down for CoG reasons, while the access points are 
> mounted higher up.

   Fair enough.

   Now if real, legal, 'security' was an issue
   then you'd want a solid connection all of
   the time ... and one wi-fi point likely won't
   provide that.

   Did a very quick look at fail-over network
   connections, but almost everything assumes
   multiple routers and perhaps iptables
   nastiness.

   Easiest ... add one wifi extender, log into
   the camera, see whether you get more bars
   with the main or the extender.


--- PyGate Linux v1.5.2
 * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 200 206 275 300 317 400 426
SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/10 280 414 418 420 422
SEEN-BY: 633/509 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 633/10 280 229/426