Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 21707  |
|  John R Walliker to All  |
|  Re: More on wifi range - Pi PICO W Oil l  |
|  24 Dec 25 14:04:03  |
 MSGID: <10igrsj$vpf9$1@dont-email.me> c88cc326 REPLY: <10iglir$1086g$2@dont-email.me> 80d8987d PID: PyGate 1.5.2 TID: PyGate/Linux 1.5.2 CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: 0000 REPLYADDR jrwalliker@gmail.com REPLYTO 3:633/10 UUCP On 24/12/2025 12:16, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 24/12/2025 07:58, mm0fmf wrote: >> On 11/12/2025 21:18, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> Home made with a box of Pringles. just google for "pringles wifi >>> antenna". >> >> Also Google cutoff frequency and see that the Pringle tube is too >> small in diameter to be effective at 2.4GHz. >> > Assuming that is a relevant issue. > > Shouting down a pipe whose diameter is way less than the wavlength of > voice frequencies, still works.... > >> Of course, designs on the internet do not have to follow the laws of >> physics! :-) >> > > ..especially for people who don't fully understand them... Indeed. And I'm sure you are perfectly well aware of the difference between longitudinal sound waves propagating down a narrow pipe and transverse electromagnetic waves in a waveguide. If a Pringles can were highly conductive it would have a cutoff frequency of close to 2.4GHz so the attenuation would be very high. However, a very thin layer of aluminium on the inside of a cardboard tube will be so resistive that it will not make a lot of difference. For many purposes a well made half-wave dipole or quarter-wave monopole gives excellent results which are far better than anything that can be achieved with small pcb antennas. A quarter wave monopole made from relatively thick wire or rod can be an excellent match to 50 ohm coax so long as the ground plane is at least a few wavelengths across. A half-wave dipole combined with a coaxial balun can also be a very good match but has a slightly narrower bandwidth due to the frequency dependency of the coax balun. The choice of which one to use depends mostly on how the antenna is to be mounted. An almost omnidirectional antenna with very low losses can be more effective than a lossy directional one. John --- PyGate Linux v1.5.2 * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 200 206 300 317 400 426 428 SEEN-BY: 229/470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/10 280 414 418 420 422 509 2744 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35 PATH: 633/10 280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]