MSGID: <10j3tdq$29dt0$1@dont-email.me> b6070c13
REPLY: <88f37b935c.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> e38014d3
PID: PyGate 1.5.2
TID: PyGate/Linux 1.5.2
CHRS: ASCII 1
TZUTC: 0000
REPLYADDR Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com
REPLYTO 3:633/10 UUCP
On 12/30/25 20:00, David Higton wrote:
> In message <10iv40e$1e1ba$1@dont-email.me>
>            Pancho  wrote:
> 
>> IPv6 seems like a world of pain.
> 
> In my experience it just works.
>

I'm surprised. Accepting that you do not do some of the things I do, 
like policy routing rules based upon a host computer IP, I'm still 
seeing servers on the internet that advertise they should work with IPv6 
but don't. This means they don't fall back to IPv4.

I'm not far enough along in my understanding to be entirely confident, 
but I would be surprised if I were wrong.


--- PyGate Linux v1.5.2
 * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 200 206 275 300 317 400 426
SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/10 280 414 418 420 422
SEEN-BY: 633/509 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 633/10 280 229/426