Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.crafts.metalworking    |    Metal working and metallurgy    |    215,319 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 214,096 of 215,319    |
|    Jim Wilkins to All    |
|    Re: Batteries - EV Conversion    |
|    01 Mar 25 17:37:07    |
      From: muratlanne@gmail.com              Those horsepower numbers seem exceedingly large. Is it really required?       I'm thinking in terms of 100hp peak, 20hp continuous at most. It       might require a multi-speed transmission, but that's key to efficiency       anyway. Am I overlooking something? A 12 kg LiFePO4 battery can deliver       about a kilowatt for a minute or so. Do you really want 250 of them?              bob prohaska              ---------------------------------------       My 91 Ford Ranger has a 105HP 4 cylinder engine that can barely get it to       70MPH on flat ground. It was fine around town and for commuting in bumper to       bumper traffic at 50MPH. I bought it for its 7' bed and put up with the       Pinto engine.              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto_engine#Lima_OHC_(LL)              "A version with two spark plugs per cylinder, distributor-less ignition, and       reduced main bearing sizes was introduced in the 1989 Ford Ranger and 1991       Ford Mustang. This engine produced 105 hp (78 kW) and 183 N⋅m (135 lb⋅ft)."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca