263ea5c2   
   XPost: alt.drugs.psychedelics, alt.drugs, alt.drugs.rfg   
   XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic   
      
   Vomit.Breath@BitchFace.com wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:17:45 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >Vomit.Breath@BitchFace.com wrote:   
   > >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:13:07 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >>>> Ok, your website, and your posts here, and the rising numbers of   
   > >>>> vists in the ER.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>  Did you read the original post:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "Leah Young, director of SAMHSA media relations, explains that the   
   > >>> agency's Drug Abuse Warning Network monitors several hospital   
   > >>> emergency rooms for reports of drug-related visits. The network   
   > >>> estimates suggest that about 2,000 people using DXM end up in   
   > >>> emergency rooms each year. While that number peaked at 2,311 visits   
   > >>> in 2002, there's been no statistically significant increase since   
   > >>> 1994."   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   According to the US government, there has been no statistically   
   > >>> significant increase in ER visits due to DXM since 1994. I got on the   
   > >>> Internet in 1997.   
   > >>   
   > >> And we all know how reliable, accurate, honest and trustworthy our   
   > >> government is, NOT!   
   > >   
   > >   There is a government conspiracy to intentionally hide the risks of a   
   > >recreational drug? Get real. If SAMHSA is going to lie, it will be in   
   the   
   > >other direction.   
   > >   
   >   
   > "And we all know how reliable, accurate, honest and trustworthy our   
   > government is, NOT!"   
   >   
   > "So you found one artical (your using to promote DXM's abuse) that   
   > loosely supports the '94 claim,  Big deal.  I work with large   
   > databases in a very large company which is used by various types of   
   > analysts and I know they can make any report come out the way I want   
   > it, so this really doesn't mean anything other than someone wrote a   
   > report to appear favorable.  I don't trust it.  Lets say for the sake   
   > of arguement that they got it right for once, which I highly doubt.   
   > Then I say, why isn't it lower now than in '94?  It's b/c of shit for   
   > brains ass holes like you that have perpetuated the problem."   
   >   
   > >> So you found one artical (your using to promote DXM's abuse) that   
   > >> loosely supports the '94 claim,  Big deal.  I work with large   
   > >> databases in a very large company which is used by various types of   
   > >> analysts and I know they can make any report come out the way I want   
   > >> it, so this really doesn't mean anything other than someone wrote a   
   > >> report to appear favorable.  I don't trust it.  Lets say for the sake   
   > >> of arguement that they got it right for once, which I highly doubt.   
   > >> Then I say, why isn't it lower now than in '94?  It's b/c of shit for   
   > >> brains ass holes like you that have perpetuated the problem.   
   > >   
   > >   Why should it be lower today absent people like me? DXM availabilty   
   has   
   > >remained universal during the period, while other psychedelics like LSD   
   have   
   > >become much more scarce. Econ 101. People switch to alternative   
   commodities   
   > >when others become scarce.   
   >   
   > B/c dip-shits like you keep perpetuating the issue by constantly   
   > posting use use, abuse, effects, etc.... over mnay mnay years.   
      
   I hate to jump in the middle of this love-fest, but I have to agree with   
   VomitBreath that you are either wittingly or unwittingly promoting DXM   
   use, Robert, and have been for years. And promotion it is. I remember a   
   post you made a few years ago telling the NG about pure DXM powder being   
   bid off on Ebay. That's not warning of the dangers, that's straight out   
   promotion, to go get the pure stuff and use it. Another point VomitBreath   
   makes that you seem to want to overlook is that it's probably mainly kids   
   who go to your site, and they aren't going there to find out the dangers   
   of DXM use, they go there to find out how to get high on it, and they   
   aren't all that interested in a bunch of "facts." They just want to know   
   how to do it. And you tell 'em. And if you don't use DXM anymore, why do   
   you keep promoting its use? How can you even remain so interested in it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)