XPost: alt.drugs.psychedelics, alt.drugs, alt.drugs.rfg   
   XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic   
      
   On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:42:45 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Vomit.Breath@BitchFace.com wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:14:23 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>  They haven't misclassified it. DXM is also a cough suppressant. And   
   >>> morphine is also a cough suppressant, along with coincidentally   
   >>> being a analgesic. Ain't pharmacology interesting? ;)   
   >>   
   >> On what medical background do you posses the right to label it a   
   >> psychedelic then?  All your previous prolific abuse of the drug?   
   >   
   >   My ability to comprehend a dictionary.   
      
   And I too comprehend a dictionary, medical one too as well as PDR's.   
   But apparently, you're saying that b/c you have a dictionary, this is   
   the basis for why you spew medical and pharmacological advice?   
   Children, be afraid, be very afraid.   
      
   >   
   >>>   Because it would be illegal to do so, dunce.   
   >>   
   >> So I'm a dunce as to take the drug companies lableing of the drugs   
   >> they have designed?   
   >   
   >  Yes. DXM has been long off patent, fool.   
   >   
      
   This makes no sense.  What difference does it make about the patents   
   being long out.  The fact is the labeling must be accurate as to what   
   it is.  They are not going to call the key ingredient for a HBP med,   
   for example, something like Zestril, and label it Preparation - H.  It   
   will be labeled accurately and to the best of their knowledge.  You   
   fool.   
      
   >> And I wouldn't be a dunce as to follo your   
   >> lableing of the drug, as a pshchedelic (when abused) from you, a guy   
   >> who admits to had being a DXM abuser and is not a doctor nor a   
   >> pharmacist nor a support person to those fields.  It's clear that you   
   >> are the dunce here.   
   >   
   >   No, it isn't to anyone with a clue.   
      
   You missed the point entirely, and on purpose.  BTW, do the kids you   
   target have a clue?  You provide brand names, doses and advertise it   
   as a psychedelic.  Those are your clues, leading kids to harm   
   themselves.  You compare this to LSD, what kind of a person would   
   provide an easy pathway for kids to take LSD?  What kind of a person   
   would provide an easy pathway for kids to OD on DXM?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)