XPost: alt.drugs.psychedelics, alt.drugs, alt.drugs.rfg   
   XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic   
      
   On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:58:28 -0500, Frederick Burroughs   
    wrote:   
      
   >"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Frederick Burroughs wrote:   
   >> > Vomit.Breath@BitchFace.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> Then why does the FDA have it misclassified?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Then why do the drug companies not make that same advirtisement on   
   >> >> their labeling?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Why do you sell the idea to youngers?   
   >> >   
   >> > Very acute observation of the totally obvious.  By calling DXM a   
   >> > psychedelic, it does become an enticement to those seeking a high,   
   >> > including kids.  As a matter of fact, RFG has made it a long-standing   
   >> > agenda to call DXM a psychedelic, suggesting a similarity with such   
   >> > drugs as LSD.  If the intent is harm reduction, then there should be   
   >> > an attempt to remove any association with a popularly abused drug   
   >> > class.   
   >>   
   >>    Why should I deny the truth? Just because LSD has a very bad reputation   
   >> doesn't mean I should lie and say DXM isn't a psychedelic drug.   
   >   
   >For recreational drug users, LSD is gold.  DXM becomes a psychedelic   
   >only at doses well above recommended therapeutic doses, does it not?   
      
   You of course are correct about LSD as well as DXM in my opinion.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)