XPost: alt.drugs.psychedelics, alt.drugs, alt.drugs.rfg   
   XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic   
      
   On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:47:54 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Vomit.Breath@BitchFace.com wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:45:43 -0500, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>   Why should I deny the truth? Just because LSD has a very bad   
   >>> reputation doesn't mean I should lie and say DXM isn't a psychedelic   
   >>> drug.   
   >>   
   >> Gez, why perpetuate such an enticement?  You know it's very popular   
   >> with kids.   
   >   
   >   If so, then whatever I say is irrelevant. If DXM is popular with kids,   
   >then they don't need me to tell them they can get high on it. They can just   
   >ask their friends. Or, watch ABC-TV.   
      
   But your web site provides the info they seek, and they go there to   
   get it.  Why don't you just take it offline?  Why don't you use a sig   
   that does not promote it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)