XPost: alt.drugs.psychedelics, alt.drugs, alt.drugs.rfg   
   XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic   
      
   On 11 Jan 2004 21:57:13 GMT, glog  wrote:   
      
   >Once upon a timeless moment,   
   >Frederick Burroughs  hallucinated:   
   >> "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>    Which recreational drug users? Seriously. The vast majority of people I   
   >>> have encountered faced to face who had taken LSD either thought it sucked,   
   >>> or just that it was uninteresting. What is your sample set for the data to   
   >>> make that statement? People who actually thought the Grateful Dead had   
   >>> serious musical talent? Note here that I am writing this as a person who   
   >>> personally has found LSD far more enjoyable as a drug than DXM. However, I   
   >>> am just one data point.   
   >>   
   >> Jesus fucking christ.  My sample set are the friends and acquaintances   
   >> I've tripped with, or discussed tripping with, face to face.  Gosh,   
   >> I'd say probably about 50 different people, maybe more, over the   
   >> years.  Aside from a very small percentage of people who experienced   
   >> severe panic reactions, everyone else enjoyed it thoroughly and valued   
   >> the experience.  Every trip, if the dose was good, was memorable and   
   >> exceptional.  I can't imagine anyone who has tripped well saying it   
   >> sucked, or was uninteresting.   
   >   
   >It's alot easier for me to imagine that RFG is so bent on   
   >propagandizing DXM as a 'psychedelic' to small children he's telling   
   >complete fucking white lies about what people say about LSD.   
   >   
      
   I find RFG's behavior to be reckless beyond belief.  That is why I   
   have ended up going off the edge on these posts.  I'm sick and tired   
   of seeing it every time I come here over the last many many years.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)