f1d3d498
XPost: rec.drugs.psychedelic, rec.drugs.smart, rec.equestrian
From: claudiawheatley@earthlink.net
In article <8s9kd.21063$5K2.3719@attbi_s03>,
"Vic Spainhower" wrote:
> >> What does that have to do with Iraq? Care to site the evidence that
> >> Iraqies
> >> have ever committed acts of terrorism against the US?
>
> Then you believe it was OK for Saddam to be murdering millions of his own
> people
Hundreds of thousands. Let's not get carried away. And she did not say
Saddam's atrocities were okay, and his atrocities were not the impetus
for our invasion of Iraq; at least, it was not the official reason given
at the time, and it's still only mentioned as a side benefit. Whether
bringing him to justice was worth 1,100 American lives, hundreds of
"Coalition of the Willing" lives, ~15,000 Iraqi lives, and $144 billion
and counting is a matter of personal opinion.
> We got involved militarily in WWII when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor
They attacked us.
> and
> we got involved militarily in the terrorists war when these Muslim
> terrorists bastards attacked us on 9/11.
The Muslim bastards who attacked us on 9/11 were not from Iraq. Not one
of them. None. Zip. Zilch.
> We will win this war in spite of
> you Laura and all of the other passiivists hiding and shivering under
> rocks.
Objecting to one war does not make a person a "passiivist" (BTW, it's
spelled "pacifist"; its root is pace, or peace).
> We are the world power and have a responsibility to protect freedom
> and this is what we will do!
I don't recall anyone asking us to do this. I recall millions asking us
not to.
C
--
"If Jesus came back, and saw what's going on in his name, he'd never
stop throwing up."
--Frederick, in Woody Allen's "Hannah and Her Sisters"
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
