XPost: alt.drugs.busts, aus.legal, aus.politics   
   XPost: soc.culture.indonesia, soc.culture.malaysia, talk.politics.drugs   
   XPost: uk.politics.drugs   
   From: enquires@asio.nsw.gov.au   
      
   "L Sternn"  wrote in message   
   news:8mauc190l470nmfj3qiksf8hvd57frbf2v@4ax.com...   
   > On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 02:09:09 GMT, "LDL"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>"adchin"  wrote in message   
   >>news:42cabce6$1_2@news.tm.net.my...   
   >>> LDL wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Then put me in the class of the not yet accused.   
   >>>   
   >>> Now wouldn't this make a mockery of the Indonesian judicial system ?   
   >>> What   
   >>> happened to the third option, of people who are innocent ?  Say if   
   >>> Indonesia has a population of 200 million, and you have 20 million   
   >>> guilty,   
   >>> the rest of the population is "not yet accused" then ?   
   >>   
   >>And just how many guilty parties have used this loophole.   
   >>   
   >>OJ Simpson, Greg Domosavich, Michael Jackson??, et al   
   >   
   > I personally think OJ did it but I honestly don't know if Michael   
   > Jackson is guilty of anything other than being freakish and very rich.   
   >   
   > I don't know who Greg Domosavich is, and the only references Google   
   > returns for it are 2 posts you've made to usenet.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>Most innocent people can easily prove their case and those who didn't are   
   >>just not smart enough.   
   >>   
   >   
   > So instead of ""Liberty and Justice for all", you believe in Liberty   
   > and Justice for anyone with a high enough IQ?   
      
   I don't believe in letting criminals off the hook that easily.  Most people   
   in society works hard to make a living without the legal thieves (the   
   government through taxes) taking away their savings but to have other   
   thieves and criminals taking away possessions of the innocents and commit   
   horrendous crimes, I prefer harsh punishments to them.   
      
   In retrospect of Schapelle Corby, her trial was made and her defence was   
   shattered.  You and I will never really know if she is guilty or innocent by   
   herself.  The evidence brought before the court was quite fine.  It sounds   
   like that you wish to listen to a voice of a buxom 27-year old female than   
   take the evidence in itself.   
      
   I had on many occasions brought the defence of the baggage labels against   
   the weight (which is enough evidence to totally clear her name) but   
   Schapelle's defence team never picked that up.  Unless Schapelle's defence   
   team is totally stupid or is it that they are attempting to create a   
   "reasonable doubt" case which is a common strategy of a criminal.   
      
   I am asking you to refute that claim?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)